Reading Diachronically: A New Reading of Book 36 of Cassius Dio’s Roman History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/histos401Keywords:
Dio, Roman Republic, competition, institutions, narrativeAbstract
The recent revision of Cassius Dio (e.g. Lange and Madsen (2016b)) has underlined the complexity of his work and the independent interpretations therein, but Book 36 has been studied almost exclusively with a focus on the lex Gabinia (Coudry (2016)). In this article, I propose a new approach: to explore Book 36 diachronically from beginning to end and through this to demonstrate Dio’s skilful structuring of his narrative with the purpose of presenting political competition as the central destructive factor of the Late Republic. Dio presents this competition as an institutional problem, rather than a moral one, and his explanation of the decline of the Republic is thereby distinctive.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Prior to 2024 authors reserve all rights, including the right to restrict republication or to withdraw their contribution from Histos. Starting in 2024, all authors published in Histos retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which means that anyone may share, copy, and adapt the material for non-commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author and this journal and do not distribute the modified version.