‘It’s Caesar [Kaiser/Tsar], Not Mr. King.’ (Mis)understanding a Caesarian Pun (Suet. Iul. 79.2) and Its Ironies

Authors

  • Christopher B. Krebs Stanford University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/histos523

Keywords:

dictum, rex, name puns, proverbial poetics, teleological fallacy, historical irony

Abstract

Caesar’s ambiguous riposte Caesarem se, non Regem esse allowed for various interpretations at the time but was most likely intended and received as a name pun—or so the comparison with Caesar Strabo’s discourse on iocus et facetiae suggests (Cic. De or. 2.216–91); Caesar may even have hoped for his words to take wing. Even if—just as humorously, but now rather ironically—he momentarily turned his name into a title, to interpret such an irony as the declaration that his cognomen was a title superior to rex represents just another instance of the teleological fallacy; then again, that an ironic joke should anticipate the name’s later titular function is itself a historical irony.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Krebs, Christopher B. 2023. “‘It’s Caesar [Kaiser Tsar], Not Mr. King.’ (Mis)understanding a Caesarian Pun (Suet. Iul. 79.2) and Its Ironies”. Histos 17 (April). https://doi.org/10.29173/histos523.

Issue

Section

Articles